You know those blogs that tell you
how to be a good parent. They always
sound a little pretentious. They sound
like they have all the answers. They
make it sound like you don’t have any of the answers. The sad thing is, anybody reading the blog
about effective parenting is usually a self-selective group of people who have
a lot of good ideas about parenting.
This isn’t a parenting blog but one about education. It will suggest some ways to fix public
schools that are habitually failing.
Kids don’t like
school. I mean, most kids don’t like
school. It’s almost all of them
right. My wife has a son that is legally
mine and he likes school. He is such a
people person that he’d gladly go to school year round. He is like Zach Morris from, Saved By the Bell, who said, “I love school, I just don’t like the classes.” I know I shouldn’t have quotation marks for a
paraphrase, but that’s a paraphrase. I
think a lot of kids fall into this category.
They like other kids, but they don’t like classes, reading, homework,
grades, or tests. They don’t like the
rules, dress codes, and discipline.
And when did
we think that schools should be fun?
When did we decide as a society that teachers are supposed to be guides
on intellectual adventures? At what
point in time was Magic School Bus’s teacher, Miss Frizzle made the
teacher du jour? I think we spend too
much time worrying about whether or not kids are getting engaged and not enough
time making sure that students are incentivized to achieve. Yes, I think engagement is important, but I
also believe engagement to be impossible for some kids because they have too
much other stuff reaching them. Their
phones can pipe in everything in the world to them instantaneously and thus,
how can teachers interest them?
Yes, there
are ways. I think there are a lot of
micro options for engagement. You have
to create a template for engagement based on your personality and demeanor. We can’t all be Jamie Escalante, but all
teachers can get better at reaching the unreachable children of the 21st
century. But how can parent help? Is there some incentive that almost every
student will work to achieve? Is there
something, the loss of which will incite action and effort for 90% of all
students?
At my school, Elgin Middle School,
there are more than 50% of the students who are ‘at risk.’ This means that the majority of the students
on my campus have at least some issues with money and parents that make enough
of it. Now guess in this campus how many
students have cell phones. It’s not all
and I’m sure it’s much different between sixth and eighth grades but the
students I had in the eighth grade had about 90 percent cell phones. Then there was about 20% A-B honor roll.
If every
parent told their kid that they couldn’t have a cell phone unless they got A-B
Honor Roll, what percent do you think would pass? It wouldn’t be all. Some students might try to succeed and still
fall a little bit short. Some kids would
be defiant and might make their parents enforce the rule. But really, how many do you think would get
A-B Honor Roll in order to keep their phone?
My guess is 80 percent. I guess
there would be 5% that don’t want their kids to have a phone because they
aren’t mature enough. I think 5%
couldn’t afford it. I think 5% would try and still not be able to succeed. I think 5% would be
defiant and lose access to their phones every six weeks.
That is my
eerily accurate unscientific estimation.
We’d go from a school who has 20% A-B to one that has 80% A-B. This might change other things. Like, I take late work even if it’s five weeks
late. I don’t think teachers would give
as many chances and might start expecting more accountability if the kids were earning incentives at home. I think students wouldn’t come to me or other
teachers and just ask, ‘what do I have to do?’
With this system they might actually try to self-govern their own
responsibilities. They might self-advocate ways to boost grades. They might do the extra credit I have
posted. If there was group work all the
student would rely on each other to produce good work so they can all either
achieve cell phone status or avoid cell phone confiscation.
This idea
isn’t one that I thought of on my own.
I’m sure there are tons of parents who do this. I had two students in my class this
year. Their parents had a rule that the
girls would lose their phones if they didn’t get all A’s, not all A’s and
B’s. Once, one of the girls had an 88
the last week of the semester came to me and got a lot of extra credit and I
offer a lot of extra credit. She ended
the grading period with a 91. I didn’t
bump her grade because she showed me a lot of effort. She earned it. The other girl got a bad grade on a test and
did all the extra credit I offered in the grading period and ended with a
96. These two girls, best buddies, had
parents with the simple rule that all parent ought to have. No A’s and B’s, no phone.
But…you say
your kid needs to get in touch with you.
No, they don’t. Your schools have
rules against the use of your student using their phone and every time they
call you within school hours you undermine your school's authority. 'My kid’s teachers are okay with them texting
and calling when they aren’t working in class.'
Well your teacher ought to explain to you why they have so much free
time. They could do that after they
explain to the administration why they aren’t enforcing the no phone
policy. My school literally told me to
not confiscate phones, but to just write students up if I saw them with a
phone. Thanks, parents. I sure that call home to ask you to bring
them lunch was seriously needed. How
many times did we call home before every kid had a cell phone? None.
‘My kid has
some sort of disease or there might be an accident.’ Give them the phone. Lock the phone from anything but calls to the
police. Am I saying that there is no
reason to have a student have a phone?
No. I’m saying earning all
privileges should be a consistent ethic your children should learn.
‘But my kid
is too old, you don’t understand. They’d
get violent if I took away their phone.’
Okay give up. My suggestion is
about encouraging parents to have a more active role in the educational lives of
their children. If your response is that
is, 'its too hard,' then I can’t actually argue that point. But leave a comment about how I don’t know
anything and that I cannot make blanket statements and how I don’t know
everyone’s situation and how I shouldn’t try to tell you how to raise your
kids.
And I
understand there are people who don’t think their kids should have cell phones
at all and some that don’t think they should earn them with good grades. Use some other carrot so the school doesn’t
have to use the stick so much. Please
leave a comment about how I’m bad for even suggesting students should sometimes
have cell phones or what you use as the carrot to get achievement out of your
kids other than a cell. One of my
parents had a kid who level of lack of effort was uncanny. He improved a little second semester and I
asked what she’d said or offered. She
said Jehovah deserved all the credit.
That would be awesome, I thought.
He returned to his old ways and failed the semester with less than a 40
the last six weeks.
Like I said,
I think reading a blog self-selects the kind of parents who might already be
doing these things or things like them.
So, if you agree with this blog/article, please try asking your friends
if their kids have a phone and if they have achievement expectations to receive
it. Ask them if they have any
achievement rewards. The idea of
creating measurable expectations for our kids’ success and some sort of payment
for success in the classroom needs to be part of our societal vernacular.
Is it part of yours?
No comments:
Post a Comment